PaperFoxPaperFox
All Users

Managing Conflicts of Interest

Declare and view conflicts of interest to ensure fair review assignments

Your conflict of interest (COI) list ensures you won't be assigned to review papers from collaborators, advisors, or co-authors.

Go to Settings in the sidebar, then click Conflicts.

COI Rules

PaperFox checks these rules when assigning reviewers to papers. Three block the assignment; one is a warning the chair can override:

RuleWhat It ChecksEffect
Self-conflictYou are listed as an author on the paperBlocks
Co-author conflictYou co-authored another paper with one of the authors in the last 3 yearsBlocks
Declared conflictYou manually declared a conflict with one of the authors (see below)Blocks
Same institutionYou share an institution with one of the authorsWarns — the chair is notified but can still assign you

The three blocking rules match on name and email; the same-institution warning matches on affiliation (see How Matching Works).

Keep your affiliation current

The same-institution warning relies on the affiliation in your profile. Keep it up to date under Settings → Profile so chairs see accurate warnings.

Declared Conflicts

Click "Add Conflict" to declare someone whose papers you should not review — for example, your PhD advisor, a close collaborator, or a co-author from outside PaperFox.

Add Conflict dialog with user search

Type a name to search existing PaperFox users. Selecting a user auto-fills their email and affiliation. You can also enter details manually for people not on PaperFox.

System-Detected Co-author Conflicts

PaperFox automatically identifies your co-authors from paper submissions on the platform. These appear under System-Detected Conflicts and update whenever a paper listing you as co-author is submitted.

System-detected co-author conflicts

System-detected conflicts show the co-author's name, email, and affiliation. Click Collaboration History to see which papers you co-authored together.

3-year window

Only co-authorships from the last 3 years are shown. Older collaborations are not considered active conflicts.

How Matching Works

The self-conflict, co-author, and declared rules compare a conflict entry against paper authors by name and email:

  • Name match — the conflict's name appears as a substring of the author's full name (case-insensitive)
  • Email match — the conflict's email exactly equals the author's email (case-insensitive)

A match on either name or email is enough to block the assignment.

The same-institution warning compares affiliations instead:

  • Organization match — when your affiliation and an author's affiliation are recognized as the same organization (PaperFox matches both to the same ROR record, so "MIT" and "Massachusetts Institute of Technology" count as the same place)
  • Affiliation name match — otherwise, the two affiliation names must be identical after ignoring case, spacing, and punctuation

This is intentionally strict: it won't treat "MIT" and "MIT Media Lab" as the same institution unless they're matched to the same organization. A missed match is safer than a noisy false warning.

For Track Chairs

COI is checked on all assignment paths — auto assign, manual drag-and-drop, and bulk save. Self-conflict, co-author, and declared conflicts block the assignment; a same-institution match is a warning the chair can override.

See the Track Chair COI Guide for details on enforcement across assignment paths and how to encourage reviewers to declare conflicts.

On this page